Committee member, Alan Selwyn writes:
For those unaware – and it has not been widely publicised – Camden proposes changing the rules to allow residents to install solar panels and solar thermal equipment (water heating tubes) anywhere on roofs without seeking planning permission. Currently in the Conservation Area, Article 4 Directions remove ‘Permitted Development Rights’ for a number of alterations to properties, mostly at the front of buildings, in order to protect the Conservation Area from inappropriate development. Among the current list of non-permitted developments are solar panels and the Conservation Area guidelines state that permission will not be given for these where visible from the street.
Camden proposes removing the current Article 4 Directions and replacing it with the same but without the protections on solar equipment. This is to make it easier to install in order to help tackle the climate emergency. The new rules would start in June 2026 and Camden has just concluded a period of consultation.
Belsoc has just completed an online survey of members in order to send a representative response to Camden. Out of the 82 respondents, around 60% were opposed to the changes, 30% in agreement and 10% neutral. 51 people posted comments, demonstrating the wide range of views for and against.
Clearly there is a balance to be struck between preserving the appearance of the Conservation Area and the urgent climate needs but where should that balance lie? If solar panels, why not also modern double or triple glazing and doors, external cladding etc? Too many changes could degrade the fundamental nature of the Conservation Area.
There will be some minor technical requirements but how will these be policed without oversight from the planning officers? And what is the evidence for the need for this change – is submitting a planning application really such a serious barrier?
Belsoc wholeheartedly supports the need to decarbonise and move to green energy and certainly solar is one valuable tool. Where equipment cannot be readily seen from the street there is no argument and there are many suitable roofs available. It seems, however, this is a step too far and that a compromise needs to be established after wider discussion with local groups and residents.
